Reflection #3
Socially speaking, I am in favor
of inclusion. I think it is important for children to be socially integrated
with all sorts of people who are different from them in order to learn how to
behave appropriately in the face of those differences. Educationally speaking,
however, I lean on the side of "ability grouping" in almost all
grades as a measure of dealing with large class sizes. Teachers are
"concerned that the incentives created by some provisions of the law have
elicited unintended responses that reduce the quality of education provided to
at least some children” (Papay, 2010). In my opinion, most
often, kids on both ends are being cheated out of a complete education. Students,
regardless of ability, experience, even grade level, could be successful if it
was easy to provide one-on-one time for each. In my current teaching
classroom I do have the opportunity to see children with special needs. Gwen
Gilmore states, “If you exclude
somebody they’re learning nothing. All they’re doing outside is probably getting
into more trouble anyway, whereas in the Inclusion they still have school”
(Gilmore, March 2012). When I get
to encounter these children in my homeroom class I try to understand them as
much as I can without treating them differently from any other student. I think
that this is very important so that they feel “normal” like the rest of their respective
classmates. My perfect world would be public school classrooms with a cap at 15
students. I would feel confident teaching any students in the
entire school if class sizes were small enough to diversify and build close
personal relationships. Let’s not fool ourselves, this is not a perfect world
and all we can do as teachers is to better understand what it is that we have
to do make each student learn at the same level without catering to one student’s
needs.
Work Cited:
Gilmore, G. (March 2012). What's so Inclusive
about an Inclusion Room? Staff Perspectives on Student Participation, Diversity
and Equality in an English Secondary School. British Journal of Special
Education, v39 n1 , 39-48. Retrieved from http://web.b.ebscohost.com.easydb.angelo.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=15&sid=144ba665-a528-4996-a4c1-b2c00700bbd0%40sessionmgr113&hid=125
Papay, R. J. (2010). Teachers’ Views on No
Child Left. Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 24, Number 3, Pages
151–166.
I like your outlook on inclusion. In my opinion, even if you are thinking, "Well this student is this certain way, and this group of students is this certain way... well they would'nt get along very well..." that in itself is limiting the student all the way around.
ReplyDeleteI agree what you say about inclusion classes. Also I do think we can be more successful with smaller classrooms. Having classes that have 20 or more students, we have to face that we might not fulfill every students needs. Good job!
ReplyDeleteI totally agree with having smaller classes. It would help a lot to make sure you can meet the needs of each student.
ReplyDelete